  | | necplusadmin@nfpa.org | A Closer Look | | A listing of conference sessions related to the upcoming 2011 NEC. | A Closer Look | NEC 2008 | | 6/2/2010 | 6/10/2010 | Conference, 2011 NEC |
 | | | A Look At 70E | Michael Fontaine | In accordance with NFPA 70E® Section 110.3(F), an electrical safety program should include a hazard identification and risk assessment procedure. This procedure is to be used before work is started within the limited approach boundary or within the arc flash boundary under certain conditions. The conditions are that there are energized electrical conductors and circuit parts operating at 50 volts or more, or that an electrical hazard exists. From the pertinent definition of exposed and of limited approach boundary in Article 100, there is no limited approach boundary if the energized conductors or circuit parts operating at 50 volts or more are suitably guarded, isolated or insulated. The determination of the arc flash boundary is independent of the determination of the shock hazard boundaries. Finally, the electrical safety plan is to identify the process by which an employee can identify hazards and assess risks before work is started, including potential risk mitigation strategies. | A Look at 70E | 70E 2012 | Annex F NFPA 70E | 11/3/2011 | 11/20/2011 | NFPA 70E Annex F FMECA Hazard Risk Assessment |
 | | | A Closer Look | Jeff Sargent | For years the automotive industry has tantalized the American public with the promise of a viable electric vehicle (EV). From the Baker Model V Electric Victoria, introduced in 1899, to later EVs such as the Citicar EV, the GM Impact, and the GM EV1, carmakers have dabbled with alternatives to the internal combustion engine. Technological and political barriers, however, coupled with consumer allegiance to fossil-fuel-powered vehicles, have all played a part in the delay of electric vehicles becoming a viable option for reliable travel. | A Closer Look | NEC 2011 | 625 | 1/18/2012 | 2/16/2012 | EV, 2011 NEC, Article 625 |
 | | | A Look At 70E | Michael Fontaine | Informative Annex F of NFPA 70E makes clear the importance of understanding and developing a systematic or orderly approach to hazard identification, risk estimation, and the application of the available methods of hazard control so as to reduce the risk associated with a particular hazard/task pair to an acceptable level. Froman electrical safety standpoint, risk can be defined as the likelihood of the occurrence of a hazardous event, and the severity of the injury that might be caused by the event. Once the level of risk is determined, if that level of risk is not acceptable, safety controls (protective measures) have to be put in place to reduce the risk to a suitable level. Therefore, it is extremely important to understand the safety control measures that are available for risk reduction, and to have a systematic approach of applying these safety control measures to the risk reduction task.
| A Look at 70E | 70E 2012 | Risk Reduction (NFPA 70E, Annex F) | 11/30/2011 | 12/16/2011 | Heirarchy of controls, Risk Reduction, NFPA 70E, Annex F |
 | | | A Closer Look | | necplus is a powerful tool and one of its most useful features is the inclusion of UL product category information for most Code sections. Not only are the UL product categories included in necplus, but the 2010 UL White Book categories are directly correlated to the 2008 NEC and located in the applicable Code sections. Whenever the “See Related” notation appears with the red “UL” link, clicking on that link will make a popup window appear identifying the UL product categories that apply to that Code section. necplus not only explains the Code requirements, but also shows the appropriate UL listed product requirements to comply with the Code requirement. | A Closer Look | NEC 2008 | UL White Book | 1/1/2011 | 1/2/2011 | UL White Book, UL Product category, online certification directory, guide information |
 | | | A Look At 70E | Michael Fontaine | In many organizations, the responsibility for seeing that hazard identification and risk assessment is properly performed for electrical safety issues belongs to the electrical safety committee, which may be a subcommittee of the general environmental health and safety committee. Hazard identification and risk assessment is effectively dependent on the members of the committee or their designees that are assigned to perform these important tasks, and the procedure is limited by the assigned personnel’s experience or knowledge of electrical safety failures. | A Look at 70E | 70E 2012 | Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment | 11/21/2011 | 11/29/2011 | Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment NFPA 70E Annex F Risk Matrix |
 | | | A Look At 70E | Michael Fontaine | Risk evaluation is the subject of F.4 of Informative Annex F of NFPA 70E-2012. Evaluating risk is really determining a risk priority number. The process of risk (risk priority number) evaluation begins with an initial risk assessment that is based upon the actual or planned conditions. If the level of risk (or the risk priority number) is unacceptable, additional or modified safety controls (protective measures) can be applied; then the impact of those safety controls on the probability of occurrence of harm (Po) -- and thereby on risk (risk priority number) -- is considered. The cumulative effect of safety control measures at each stage is used to estimate the residual risk (or final risk priority number) at a given stage of the evaluation process. The necplus article Risk Assessment (Risk or Risk Priority Number Assessment) explains this process in more detail. | A Look at 70E | NEC 2011 | NFPA 70E Risk Evaluation Process | 12/19/2011 | 1/13/2012 | NFPA 70E Risk Evaluation Process |
 | | | A Look At 70E | Michael Fontaine | In Section F.2 of Informative Annex F, NFPA 70E defines risk as the severity of harm or possible harm associated with a hazard/task pair and the probability of occurrence of that harm. The probability of occurrence is a function of the frequency and duration of the exposure of persons to that harm, the probability of occurrence of the hazardous event, and the possibility of avoiding or limiting the harm associated with the hazardous event. Risk, or the risk priority number (RPN), may be described by the following equation: | A Look at 70E | 70E 2012 | Risk Priority Number Assessment (RPN) | | | Risk Priority Number Assessment RPN Annex F NFPA 70E |
 | | | A Look At 70E | Michael Fontaine | | A Look at 70E | 70E 2012 | Risk Reduction and Risk Assessment | 10/30/2011 | 11/16/2011 | Risk Reduction Risk Assessment NFPA 70E |
 | | | A Closer Look | Chris Coache | Ground-fault circuit-interrupter (GFCI) protection has been in the National Electrical Code® (NEC®) for 50 years. Many thought there could not possibly be any additional locations where GFCI protection was needed, but the 2011 edition shows that there are still areas that can benefit from this protection. Actually, new GFCI requirements have been added in every edition since 1971, but most people are only aware of those specified in 210.8. This article looks back at the history of GFCI requirements. Although Articles 210, 590 and 680 — those that have the longest history — are the focus, other notable requirements are included. Also, Code terminology has changed over the years; the terms used will be from the edition referenced. | A Closer Look | NEC | NEC History | 2/3/2012 | 2/29/2012 | History NEC, GFCI |
 | | | A Look At 70E | Michael Fontaine | This article, the first in a series of articles dealing with Informative Annex F, covers the information contained in F.1, the general information section. This annex contains a lot of important information and guidance, especially for those who are not familiar with the hazard identification and risk assessment process — this includes many of the people involved with electrical safety issues.
| A Look at 70E | 70E 2012 | Annex F NFPA 70E | 11/3/2011 | 1/2/2012 | NFPA 70E Annex F Electrical Safety |
 | | | A Look At 70E | Michael Fontaine | After the risk has been assessed and evaluated and appropriate electrical safety controls (protective measures) have been determined and put in place, the final step before electrical work is actually started is to ensure that all required electrical safety controls have been implemented. This is accomplished through a verification process. Verification is the act of confirming the truth of a matter or situation through evidence. We might call it a verification and validation process, because what we’re discussing is a process of checking that a product, service, system, or the like meets specifications and fulfills its intended purpose. Here, it is the act of confirming that the required electrical safety controls (protective measures) have been put into place and are ready to be used. This requirement is discussed in F.5.1 of Informative Annex F of NFPA 70E.
| A Look at 70E | 70E 2012 | Risk Reduction Verification and Auditing | 1/4/2012 | 2/4/2012 | Risk Reduction Verification Auditing NFPA 70E Annex F |